The action
What you do alone, every day. Useful, measurable, and in its right place: the most visible scale, not the heaviest one.
The Down to Earth Programme
understanding the environment, acting at your own scale
This programme holds what the association publishes about the environment: understanding what is at stake, telling an order of magnitude from an impression, and seeing where decisions are really taken, from a home to a town council. It sticks to established facts and verifiable actions. No doom and no lecturing: someone who leaves this programme should be better at working out what weighs, not feel guiltier.
Why this field matters
On the environment, almost everyone has already heard a great deal, and almost nobody can rank it. A highly visible action passes for an important one; an enormous item stays invisible because it never shows up during the day. The result: we argue hard about details, and the decisions that actually weigh get taken without us.
What is missing comes down to one phrase: order of magnitude. Knowing that one thing counts ten times more than another changes behaviour far more than a moral argument does. It is a skill in reading figures and doing rough arithmetic, not an opinion, and it is learned like anything else: by practising on cases where you get it wrong first, then less often.
Finally, the scale of the individual action is not the only one, and that is good news. A home, a school, a town decide things no single resident decides alone: a heating system, a contract, a transport plan, a canteen. Knowing where a decision is taken, and while it is still open, is worth more than sorting your rubbish harder on your own.
Four scales
What you do alone, every day. Useful, measurable, and in its right place: the most visible scale, not the heaviest one.
Heating, insulation, appliances, contracts. One decision a year or a decade, often weighing more than a thousand daily actions.
A school, a library, an association: purchases, travel, meals, an organization. A collective scale, and one you can actually discuss.
Transport, buildings, waste, planning. Public decisions, with meetings, documents, and deadlines that can be looked up.
The programme’s rule
An order of magnitude is not an impression, and an impression is not corrected by another impression.
That is why this programme publishes no figure that cannot be traced to a source you can consult, and never sets two numbers side by side without saying what each one refers to. On this subject more than any other, an approximate figure does more damage than no figure at all: it is remembered, it gets repeated, and it ends up serving as an argument.

What is online
This shelf of the catalogue exists, it is named, and it carries the subject above. The house rule holds here as everywhere else: a resource joins a programme the day it is online and can be visited, never on an announcement, and it is named here then, with its address and figures anyone can recount.
The resources of this programme are named on this page when they go online.
Two ways to use it
Being able to rank, compare, and spot when a figure means nothing. That is what lets you choose without being told stories, in either direction.
A school, an association, a neighbourhood council all discuss concrete choices. A shared factual base beats seven convictions there: it makes the discussion possible at all.
The shape
The field changes from one programme to the next; the shape does not. These construction rules are not promises: they can be checked today, on the 2 resources the association already has online.
The last line belongs to this subject, and it costs work: it rules out the shortcuts that make content punchier and less accurate.
The shape described above can be checked on the 2 resources the association already has online, and the catalogue shows the 7 programmes side by side.